


If your Webflow site looks great but isn’t ranking, you’re not alone—and it’s not because Webflow is “bad for SEO”.
I’ve spent 7+ years in SEO and 6+ years working deeply with Webflow, and I’ve seen the same pattern repeat itself across startups, SaaS companies, and scale-ups:
beautiful Webflow sites, solid content, decent backlinks… and still no meaningful organic growth.
The reason is simple.
Webflow SEO is not automatic, and most Webflow builds are not created with search engines in mind.
I’m Utsav Kataria.
Over the last few years, I’ve worked on 120+ projects, optimised 100+ Webflow websites, and handled sites ranging from small marketing pages to 2,000+ page CMS-driven platforms. I’ve worked on websites generating 1M+ monthly organic users and ranking for 200,000+ keywords across competitive industries.
This page is for people who are actively looking to hire a Webflow SEO consultant—someone who understands Webflow’s structure, CMS limitations, performance quirks, and how Google actually evaluates modern websites.

You’re probably here because one (or more) of these sounds familiar:
If that’s the case, you don’t need generic SEO advice.
You need Webflow-specific SEO expertise.
This page explains what a Webflow SEO consultant actually does, the issues that typically hold Webflow sites back, and how I approach fixing them in a way that aligns with Google’s EEAT framework, real search data, and long-term scalability.
A Webflow SEO consultant sits at the intersection of technical SEO, CMS architecture, and platform-specific execution.
In practical terms, this means:
This is very different from traditional SEO work.
Most SEO agencies treat Webflow like WordPress with a different UI. That approach breaks down fast—especially once you’re dealing with large CMS sites, dynamic pages, or thousands of URLs.
A proper Webflow SEO consultant understands:
That’s the difference between “SEO recommendations” and SEO that actually moves rankings.
Webflow is a powerful platform—but it’s very easy to get SEO wrong if you don’t know what to look for.
Here’s what I see most often when auditing Webflow sites.
Most Webflow sites are built visually first. Headings, sections, and CMS fields are designed for layout—not for semantic structure. Search engines don’t care how clean the UI looks if the hierarchy underneath is broken.
Webflow CMS is flexible, but it doesn’t enforce SEO best practices. Without deliberate planning, you end up with:
These problems compound as the site grows.
Incorrect canonicals, unintentional noindex tags, pagination problems, and sitemap misconfigurations are extremely common on Webflow sites—especially after migrations or redesigns.
Webflow makes it easy to add interactions and animations, but those come at a cost. I regularly see strong content held back by poor LCP, CLS, or INP scores caused by unoptimised assets and scripts.
Webflow is capable of programmatic SEO—but only if the CMS is structured properly. Most sites never take advantage of this and end up publishing content manually, one page at a time, with limited reach.
The key point here is this:
these are structural issues, not content problems.

When I run a Webflow SEO audit, these are the issues that show up again and again—across industries and site sizes:
None of these are “advanced SEO tricks”.
They’re foundational—and when they’re wrong, everything else suffers.
This is where Webflow-specific experience matters. Fixing these issues properly requires understanding how Webflow outputs code, not just what Google’s guidelines say in theory.

This is an important distinction, and it’s where a lot of Webflow SEO goes wrong.
A Webflow developer’s job is to make the site look and function well.
A Webflow SEO expert’s job is to make sure that site gets discovered, indexed, and scaled in search by ensuring all technical seo, on-page seo etc. is set up perfectly.
Both roles matter—but they are not the same.
I’ve worked on many sites where the design was flawless, animations were smooth, and CMS collections were well thought out visually… yet the site struggled to rank because SEO fundamentals were missing at the structural level.
Here’s the difference in practice:
This is why Webflow SEO often fails when handled as an afterthought. SEO has to be built into the structure—not layered on later.
My approach to Webflow SEO is shaped by years of working on large, real-world sites—not just theory or checklists.
I’ve worked on:
Because of that, my process is practical, data-backed, and focused on long-term stability—not quick wins that break later.
Every engagement starts with understanding how the site is actually built.
I audit:
This isn’t a generic SEO audit. It’s a Webflow-first audit, grounded in how the platform works.
Once issues are identified, I focus on removing anything that blocks search engines from understanding or trusting the site.
This includes:
At this stage, the goal is simple:
make the site easy for Google to crawl, understand, and trust.
Webflow CMS is powerful, but only when structured correctly.
I rework CMS setups so that:
This is where many Webflow sites start seeing real movement.
SEO doesn’t live in isolation anymore. Performance matters.
I optimise:
The goal is not a perfect Lighthouse score—it’s real-world performance that supports rankings.
For larger sites, I help build programmatic SEO systems using Webflow CMS.
This allows you to:
Programmatic SEO only works when the foundation is right. I don’t force it where it doesn’t belong.
Depending on the site and stage, my work typically includes:
Some clients need a one-time structural fix.
Others need long-term SEO support as they scale.
The approach is flexible—but always Webflow-first.
You should seriously consider hiring a Webflow SEO consultant if:
In most cases, the issue isn’t effort—it’s structure.
Yes. Webflow is SEO-capable, but rankings depend on how the site is structured. Default settings cover basics, not competitive SEO. Proper CMS setup, internal linking, performance optimisation, and schema are what make Webflow rank.
If your site runs on Webflow, platform-specific expertise matters. General SEO agencies often know what to fix, but not how to implement it correctly in Webflow—especially for CMS, indexing, and performance issues.
The principles are the same, but execution differs. Webflow relies more on clean templates, CMS structure, and front-end performance, while WordPress relies heavily on plugins. SEO in Webflow is more architectural than plugin-driven.
Yes. Webflow can support thousands of pages when CMS collections, internal linking, and index control are planned properly. Most issues at scale come from poor structure, not platform limits.
Technical and structural fixes often show impact within weeks. Strong ranking gains typically take a few months as Google re-evaluates the site’s structure, content quality, and authority.
If your Webflow site isn’t ranking, the issue is usually technical or structural, not your content.
A focused Webflow SEO audit will show exactly what’s holding your site back—and what needs to change to unlock growth.
Most growth problems aren’t about a lack of ideas—they’re about execution. If you want support applying proven marketing and SEO strategies to your business, we’re happy to take a look.
